Hsa 530 week 8 assignment 2

Points: 320

Assignment 2: Human Resources Policies and Procedures

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 70% F

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Examine a significant way that the Joint Commission has influenced the basic functions of HRM and predict the likely impact of the policies and procedures at the your acute hospital. Provide support for your rationale.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely examined a significant way that the Joint Commission has influenced the basic functions of HRM and did not submit or incompletely predicted the likely impact of the policies and procedures at the your acute hospital. Did not submit or incompletely provided support for your rationale.

Partially examined a significant way that the Joint Commission has influenced the basic functions of HRM and partially predicted the likely impact of the policies and procedures at the your acute hospital. Partially provided support for your rationale.

Satisfactorily examined a significant way that the Joint Commission has influenced the basic functions of HRM and satisfactorily predicted the likely impact of the policies and procedures at the your acute hospital. Satisfactorily provided support for your rationale.

Thoroughly examined a significant way that the Joint Commission has influenced the basic functions of HRM and thoroughly predicted the likely impact of the policies and procedures at the your acute hospital. Thoroughly provided support for your rationale.

2. Analyze the importance of collaboration between HR and department managers when filling open positions, indicating the most likely impact on the hiring process.
Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the importance of collaboration between HR and department managers when filling open positions, indicating the most likely impact on the hiring process.

Partially analyzed the importance of collaboration between HR and department managers when filling open positions, indicating the most likely impact on the hiring process.

Satisfactorily analyzed the importance of collaboration between HR and department managers when filling open positions, indicating the most likely impact on the hiring process.

Thoroughly analyzed the importance of collaboration between HR and department managers when filling open positions, indicating the most likely impact on the hiring process.

3. Create a detailed outline of a training program for managers. The outline should include, at a minimum, interviewing techniques that both help managers identify the best candidate for the job and meet the requirements of appropriate employment laws and regulations.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely created a detailed outline of a training program for managers. Did not submit or incompletely included, at a minimum, interviewing techniques that both help managers identify the best candidate for the job and meet the requirements of appropriate employment laws and regulations.

Partially created a detailed outline of a training program for managers. Partially included, at a minimum, interviewing techniques that both help managers identify the best candidate for the job and meet the requirements of appropriate employment laws and regulations.

Satisfactorily created a detailed outline of a training program for managers.  Satisfactorily included, at a minimum, interviewing techniques that both help managers identify the best candidate for the job and meet the requirements of appropriate employment laws and regulations.

Thoroughly created a detailed outline of a training program for managers. Thoroughly included, at a minimum, interviewing techniques that both help managers identify the best candidate for the job and meet the requirements of appropriate employment laws and regulations.

4. Determine the most significant factor that should be considered in order to develop a  compensation and benefit plan that is fair, competitive, and aligned with the organization’s strategic objectives, indicating the direct impact of each factor on the elements.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely determined the most significant factor that should be considered in order to develop a  compensation and benefit plan that is fair, competitive, and aligned with the organization’s strategic objectives, indicating the direct impact of each factor on the elements.

Partially determined the most significant factor that should be considered in order to develop a compensation and benefit plan that is fair, competitive, and aligned with the organization’s strategic objectives, indicating the direct impact of each factor on the elements.

Satisfactorily determined the most significant factor that should be considered in order to develop a compensation and benefit plan that is fair, competitive, and aligned with the organization’s strategic objectives, indicating the direct impact of each factor on the elements.

Thoroughly determined the most significant factor that should be considered in order to develop a compensation and benefit plan that is fair, competitive, and aligned with the organization’s strategic objectives, indicating the direct impact of each factor on the elements.

5. Recommend a performance appraisal method that you believe would be the most effective for the organization and support the reasons for your decision. Provide support for your recommendation.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely recommended a performance appraisal method that you believe would be the most effective for the organization and support the reasons for your decision. Did not submit or incompletely provided support for your recommendation.

Partially recommended a performance appraisal method that you believe would be the most effective for the organization and support the reasons for your decision. Partially provided support for your recommendation.

Satisfactorily recommended a performance appraisal method that you believe would be the most effective for the organization and support the reasons for your decision. Satisfactorily provided support for your recommendation.

Thoroughly recommended a performance appraisal method that you believe would be the most effective for the organization and support the reasons for your decision. Thoroughly provided support for your recommendation.

6. Create a strategy to effectively manage both performance- and behavioral-based employee problems, which will lead to the desired behavior result.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely created a strategy to effectively manage both performance- and behavioral-based employee problems, which will lead to the desired behavior result.

Partially created a strategy to effectively manage both performance- and behavioral- based employee problems, which will lead to the desired behavior result.

Satisfactorily created a strategy to effectively manage both performance- and behavioral-based employee problems, which will lead to the desired behavior result.

Thoroughly created a strategy to effectively manage both performance- and behavioral- based employee problems, which will lead to the desired behavior result.

7. 3 references

Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

8. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 6 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more