“Elise and Unproductive Conflict at Main Street Bakeries” . Which conflict theories best explain what is happening in the scenario?
The case study “Elise and Unproductive Conflict at Main Street Bakeries” reflects the
typical instance of the theory of structural source of conflict. According to Raines (2013),
structural sources of conflict comprise of “unfair, unclear, or inefficient policies, procedures,
organizational cultures, or ingrained practices that repeatedly give rise to disputes irrespective
of personnel changes” (Raines, 2013, p. 60). The assistant managers at store number seventy-
five would not retain for longer time because of the erroneous policies implemented by the store
manager – Janice. She was clearly not candid in her communication and would have no
empathy for the assistant managers’ feelings. In addition, her refusal to delegate any important
tasks to the assistant managers showed her lack of trust in the assistant managers.
Moreover, according to Reyes (2013), “…individuals within a cultural group will continue
to exhibit individualized differences in the type of fairness they prefer…” This introduces a bias
among the individuals in the group because of unfair treatment of one over the other. In case of
Janice, she might have different cultural preferences over who should get a merit bonus, and
therefore her distribution of merit bonuses lacked transparency.
In addition, the author also defines “power” in Power in Theory and Practice as the ability
to accomplish one’s goals over the objections of others if necessary (Raines, 2013). She also
explains that managers should be able to exercise their power and authority when others view
their exercise of power as legitimate and useful. Building positive relationships with one’s
subordinates, peers, and supervisors is crucial to building and maintaining power as a manager.
However, in case of Janice, she failed to create such relationship with her subordinates, and
therefore introduced conflict.
References
Raines, S. S. (2013).
Conflict management for managers: Resolving workplace, client, and
policy disputes
. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/ John Wiley & Sons.
Parameshwar,
I agree with your analysis of the discussion question posted. Just wanted to add some
important points that I found while doing my own analysis.
I think that the case study also reflects an example of the “theory of structural source of conflict”.
According to Raines (2013), structural sources of conflict comprise of “unfair, unclear, or
inefficient policies, procedures, organizational cultures, or ingrained practices that repeatedly
give rise to disputes irrespective of personnel changes” (Raines, 2013, p. 60). The assistant
managers at store number seventy-five would not retain for longer time because of the
erroneous policies implemented by the store manager – Janice. She was clearly not candid in
her communication and would have no empathy for the assistant managers’ feelings. In
addition, her refusal to delegate any important tasks to the assistant managers showed her lack
of trust in the assistant managers.
References
Raines, S. S. (2013).
Conflict management for managers: Resolving workplace, client, and
policy disputes
. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/ John Wiley & Sons.
Vinit,
I agree with your analysis of the discussion question posted. Just wanted to add some
important points that I found while doing my own analysis.
The author also defines “power” in Power in Theory and Practice as the ability to
accomplish one’s goals over the objections of others if necessary (Raines, 2013). She also
explains that managers should be able to exercise their power and authority when others view
their exercise of power as legitimate and useful. Building positive relationships with one’s
subordinates, peers, and supervisors is crucial to building and maintaining power as a manager.
However, in case of Janice, she failed to create such relationship with her subordinates, and
therefore introduced conflict.
References
Raines, S. S. (2013).
Conflict management for managers: Resolving workplace, client, and
policy disputes
. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/ John Wiley & Sons.
First and foremost, I was impressed by the ease of navigation on the website. Finding the specific service I needed and placing an order was straightforward, and the user-friendly interface made the entire process hassle-free.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more
