ADD5107: Week 10 Discussion 2: DSM-5 Criticism: A Follow-Up
Frances (2012) identifies 10 points of disagreement with the changes in diagnostic
categories and criteria the DSM-5 ended up incorporating. He published the op-ed you
read from Psychology Today in late 2012, just after the final version of the DSM-5 was
approved. We have now moved to an era in which the DSM-5-TR is the standard for
diagnosis.
For your initial post, choose two of Frances’s points of criticism. Reference scholarly
research that has been conducted since the op-ed’s publication, and comment on the
accuracy of the author’s predictions for potential harm resulting from the DSM-5 ‘s
changes.
Note: Please see attached
Note: 2 reference required
Note: Minimum of 300 words.
DSM5IsGuideNotBibleIgnoreItsTenWorstChanges_PsychologyToday.pdf
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more